Reprint of “Non-canonical reading: Reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Liversedge and Reichle” [Vision Research 49/14 (2008) 1916–1918]
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Non-canonical reading: Reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Liversedge and Reichle (2008)
Rayner, Pollatsek, Liversedge and Reichle offer a spirited critique of our paper (Kennedy & Pynte, 2008). Their argument is that our data were obtained selectively, that the effects reported are not typical of normal reading and, in any case, do not pose particularly severe theoretical problems for serial models of reading like E–Z Reader. In this rebuttal we follow the organisation of their Co...
متن کاملEye movements and non-canonical reading: Comments on Kennedy and Pynte (2008)
Kennedy and Pynte [Kennedy, A., & Pynte, J. (2008). The consequences of violations to reading order: An eye movement analysis. Vision Research, 48, 2309-2320] presented data that they suggested pose problems for models of eye movement control in reading in which words are encoded serially. They focus on situations in which pairs of words are fixated out of order (i.e., the first word is skipped...
متن کاملUsing E-Z Reader to examine the concurrent development of eye-movement control and reading skill.
Compared to skilled adult readers, children typically make more fixations that are longer in duration, shorter saccades, and more regressions, thus reading more slowly (Blythe & Joseph, 2011). Recent attempts to understand the reasons for these differences have discovered some similarities (e.g., children and adults target their saccades similarly; Joseph, Liversedge, Blythe, White, & Rayner, 2...
متن کاملEye movement control in reading: accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model
Reilly and O'Regan (1998, Vision Research, 38, 303-317) used computer simulations to evaluate how well several different word-targeting strategies could account for results which show that the distributions of fixation locations in reading are systematically related to low-level oculomotor variables, such as saccade distance and launch site [McConkie, Kerr, Reddix & Zola, (1988). Vision Researc...
متن کاملUsing Reinforcement Learning to Examine Dynamic Attention Allocation During Reading
A fundamental question in reading research concerns whether attention is allocated strictly serially, supporting lexical processing of one word at a time, or in parallel, supporting concurrent lexical processing of two or more words (Reichle, Liversedge, Pollatsek, & Rayner, 2009). The origins of this debate are reviewed. We then report three simulations to address this question using artificia...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Vision Research
دوره 49 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009